[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQv4giq5r4AKv4Ff1KP7k7US2Sdt=m1ZAXsDmKWKhZ9vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:13:27 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
wang.bo116@....com.cn, WangBo <wdjjwb@....com>
Subject: Re: + include-linux-typesh-use-unsigned-int-instead-of-unsigned.patch
added to -mm tree
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:08 AM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 09:41:09AM -0800, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/types.h~include-linux-typesh-use-unsigned-int-instead-of-unsigned
> > +++ a/include/linux/types.h
> > @@ -155,9 +155,9 @@ typedef u64 dma_addr_t;
> > typedef u32 dma_addr_t;
> > #endif
> >
> > -typedef unsigned __bitwise gfp_t;
> > -typedef unsigned __bitwise slab_flags_t;
> > -typedef unsigned __bitwise fmode_t;
> > +typedef unsigned int __bitwise gfp_t;
> > +typedef unsigned int __bitwise slab_flags_t;
> > +typedef unsigned int __bitwise fmode_t;
>
> I don't know if this is desireable. Switching to "unsigned" is better:
> 1 less token and less 80 column pressure.
See the following commit.
commit a1ce18e4f941d2039aa3bdeee17db968919eac2f
Author: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Tue Mar 15 14:58:03 2016 -0700
checkpatch: warn on bare unsigned or signed declarations without int
Kernel style prefers "unsigned int <foo>" over "unsigned <foo>" and
"signed int <foo>" over "signed <foo>".
Emit a warning for these simple signed/unsigned <foo> declarations. Fix
it too if desired.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists