[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1128468323.249298.1551468912168@email.ionos.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 20:35:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: mlangsdo@...hat.com, suzuki.poulose@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, julien.thierry@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andre.Przywara@....com, Dave.Martin@....com,
shankerd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] arm64: add system vulnerability sysfs entries
Hi Jeremy,
> Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com> hat am 27. Februar 2019 um 02:05 geschrieben:
>
>
> Arm64 machines should be displaying a human readable
> vulnerability status to speculative execution attacks in
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities
>
> This series enables that behavior by providing the expected
> functions. Those functions expose the cpu errata and feature
> states, as well as whether firmware is responding appropriately
> to display the overall machine status. This means that in a
> heterogeneous machine we will only claim the machine is mitigated
> or safe if we are confident all booted cores are safe or
> mitigated.
>
here are the results for Raspberry Pi 3 B:
l1tf:Not affected
meltdown:Not affected
spec_store_bypass:Not affected
spectre_v1:Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization
spectre_v2:Not affected
Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists