lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:56:24 +0530
From:   Prateek Patel <prpatel@...dia.com>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <talho@...dia.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
        <snikam@...dia.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: reserved_mem: disable kmemleak scan on removed memory
 blocks


On 3/4/2019 4:04 PM, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:56 PM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:46 PM Prateek Patel <prpatel@...dia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2018 2:58 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:09 AM Prateek Patel <prpatel@...dia.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Memory reserved with "nomap" DT property in of_reserved_mem.c
>>>>> removes the memory block. The removed memory blocks don't have
>>>>> VA to PA mapping created in kernel page table. Kmemleak scan on
>>>>> removed memory blocks is causing page faults and leading to
>>>>> kernel panic. So, Disable kmemleak scan on the removed memory
>>>>> blocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Following is the observed crash log:
>>>>> [  154.846370] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc070a00000
>>>>> <1>[  154.846576] Mem abort info:
>>>>> <1>[  154.846635]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>>>>> <1>[  154.846737]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
>>>>> <1>[  154.846796]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
>>>>> <1>[  154.846859] Data abort info:
>>>>> <1>[  154.846913]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
>>>>> <1>[  154.846983]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
>>>>> <1>[  154.847053] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgd = ffffff8009df7000
>>>>> <1>[  154.847228] [ffffffc070a00000] *pgd=000000087fff5803, *pud=000000087fff5803, *pmd=0000000000000000
>>>>> <0>[  154.847408] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>>> <4>[  154.847511] Modules linked in: nvs_led_test nvs_bmi160 nvs_cm3218 nvs_bh1730fvc nvi_bmpX80 nvi_ak89xx nvi_mpu cdc_acm uas lr388k7_ts imx268 imx318 imx204 imx274 imx185 lc898212 ov23850 ov10823 ov9281 ov5693 tc358840 pca9570 nvs snd_soc_tegra_machine_driver_mobile lp855x_bl spidev input_cfboost pwm_tegra tegra_cryptodev tegra_se_nvhost tegra_se_elp tegra_se ghash_ce sha2_ce sha1_ce aes_ce_ccm cryptd nvgpu cpufreq_userspace snd_soc_tegra186_alt_dspk snd_soc_tegra186_alt_asrc snd_soc_tegra186_alt_arad snd_soc_tegra210_alt_ope snd_soc_tegra210_alt_mvc snd_soc_tegra210_alt_dmic snd_soc_tegra210_alt_amx snd_soc_tegra210_alt_adx snd_soc_tegra210_alt_afc snd_soc_tegra210_alt_mixer snd_soc_tegra210_alt_i2s snd_soc_tegra210_alt_sfc snd_soc_tegra210_alt_adsp snd_soc_tegra210_alt_admaif snd_soc_tegra210_alt_xbar
>>>>> <4>[  154.882606]  snd_soc_tegra_alt_utils snd_hda_tegra
>>>>> <4>[  154.888133] CPU: 2 PID: 8079 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.14.53-tegra-05132-g9c33465 #2
>>>>> <4>[  154.895983] Hardware name: e3360_1099 (DT)
>>>>> <4>[  154.900447] task: ffffffc7d62dda00 task.stack: ffffff800e2b0000
>>>>> <4>[  154.906502] PC is at scan_block+0x7c/0x148
>>>>> <4>[  154.911234] LR is at scan_block+0x78/0x148
>>>>> <4>[  154.915689] pc : [<ffffff8008271724>] lr : [<ffffff8008271720>] pstate: 804000c9
>>>>> <4>[  154.923290] sp : ffffff800e2b3b80
>>>>> <4>[  154.927228] x29: ffffff800e2b3b80 x28: ffffffc7d62dda00
>>>>> <4>[  154.932999] x27: ffffff8009aaa000 x26: ffffffc070c00000
>>>>> <4>[  154.938769] x25: 00000000000000c0 x24: ffffff8009d90608
>>>>> <4>[  154.944287] x23: ffffffc7dc6c6000 x22: ffffff8009d90000
>>>>> <4>[  154.950320] x21: ffffff8009aeb320 x20: ffffffc070a00ff9
>>>>> <4>[  154.955919] x19: ffffffc070a00000 x18: 00000000bec4c3f2
>>>>> <4>[  154.961438] x17: 0000002224777924 x16: ffffff80080bb0e0
>>>>> <4>[  154.967124] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000f75
>>>>> <4>[  154.973069] x13: 000fffffffffffff x12: ffffffbf1e9f4240
>>>>> <4>[  154.978670] x11: 0000000000000040 x10: 0000000000000ad0
>>>>> <4>[  154.984107] x9 : ffffff800e2b3ab0 x8 : ffffffc7d62de530
>>>>> <4>[  154.989958] x7 : 0000000780000000 x6 : 0000000000000018
>>>>> <4>[  154.995645] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
>>>>> <4>[  155.001245] x3 : ffffff8009aaa000 x2 : 00000047f6712000
>>>>> <4>[  155.006846] x1 : ffffffc7d1ae6900 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [snip]
>
> For reference, there is another patch series that fixes the problem,
> by Mike Rapoport (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1041790/),
> already in linux-next (through mmotm):
> 42c9c0ac24393c of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in early
> memory reservation
> 48ec6d51f7d3f2 of: fix parameters order for call to memblock_find_in_range()
>
> If anyone is interested, I backported these patch to our 4.19 tree
> here, and they fix the issue:
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1496707
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1496708
>
> Thanks,

Thanks Nicolas for the reference,

My acked-by is already present in the patch 
(https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1041790/)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists