[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190305164017.GD17272@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:40:17 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>,
Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@...ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: Get precise_ip from the pmu config
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:28:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:13:19AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:25:33PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > Getting precise_ip field from the perf_pmu::max_precise
> > > config read from sysfs. If it's not available falling
> > > back to current detection function.
> >
> > max_precise depends on the event. This won't work for all
> > events. For example only instructions and cycles support
> > ppp
>
> I'm getting precise_ip=3 on mem-* events as well, that's why I
> was fixing this.. now it's not working for any event
I don't think it means anything for mem-*
There's some support for it on Goldmont plus for other events,
but it doesn't support mem-*. On big core it's only
for instructions and cycles, all implemented with the same
event. All other PEBS events only have two levels
switching between the two IPs.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists