linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/13] regulator: da9055: Fix notifier mutex lock warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c6986eee295d5859c8267f0228f7508a22bd4fd.1551808797.git.stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:59:59 +0000
From:   Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] regulator: da9055: Fix notifier mutex lock warning

The mutex for the regulator_dev must be controlled by the caller of
the regulator_notifier_call_chain(), as described in the comment
for that function.

Failure to mutex lock and unlock surrounding the notifier call results
in a kernel WARN_ON_ONCE() which will dump a backtrace for the
regulator_notifier_call_chain() when that function call is first made.
The mutex can be controlled using the regulator_lock/unlock() API.

Fixes: f6130be652d0 ("regulator: DA9055 regulator driver")
Suggested-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
index 588c3d24..acba42d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
@@ -515,8 +515,10 @@ static irqreturn_t da9055_ldo5_6_oc_irq(int irq, void *data)
 {
 	struct da9055_regulator *regulator = data;
 
+	regulator_lock(regulator->rdev);
 	regulator_notifier_call_chain(regulator->rdev,
 				      REGULATOR_EVENT_OVER_CURRENT, NULL);
+	regulator_unlock(regulator->rdev);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
1.9.3