[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d77e5ba-3de6-801c-8497-6a219665bc57@ghiti.fr>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:41:55 -0500
From: Alex Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@...wei.com>,
"mhocko@...nel.org" <mhocko@...nel.org>,
"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/hugetlb: Fix unsigned overflow in
__nr_hugepages_store_common()
On 3/5/19 4:35 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 3/5/19 1:16 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:15:40 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew, this is on top of Alexandre Ghiti's "hugetlb: allow to free gigantic
>>> pages regardless of the configuration" patch. Both patches modify
>>> __nr_hugepages_store_common(). Alex's patch is going to change slightly
>>> in this area.
>> OK, thanks, I missed that. Are the changes significant?
>>
> No, changes should be minor. IIRC, just checking for a condition in an
> error path.
I will send the v5 of this patch tomorrow, I was waiting for architecture
maintainer remarks. I still miss sh, but I'm confident on this change.
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists