[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a2b9277-acbf-eda4-d043-74463d7b61c7@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:49:28 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Weichao Guo <guoweichao@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] f2fs: guarantee journalled quota data by checkpoint
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2018/9/20 20:05, Chao Yu wrote:
> @@ -3456,3 +3477,16 @@
>
> extern void f2fs_build_fault_attr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int rate,
>
> #endif
> #endif
> +
> +static inline bool is_journalled_quota(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
> + if (f2fs_sb_has_quota_ino(sbi->sb))
> + return true;
> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[USRQUOTA] ||
> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[GRPQUOTA] ||
> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[PRJQUOTA])
> + return true;
> +#endif
> + return false;
> +}
I checked dev branch, and found one patch we didn't send to mailing list,
could you please send it out?
f2fs: fix wrong #endif
I think my quota patch caused this 'wrong #endif' issue, could you add
single line comment to notice which #if the last #endif is corresponding
to? so that we can avoid same mistake as quota patch made.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists