[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190312182855.GA45421@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:28:55 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Weichao Guo <guoweichao@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] f2fs: guarantee journalled quota data by checkpoint
On 03/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2018/9/20 20:05, Chao Yu wrote:
> > @@ -3456,3 +3477,16 @@
> >
> > extern void f2fs_build_fault_attr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int rate,
> >
> > #endif
> > #endif
> > +
> > +static inline bool is_journalled_quota(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
> > + if (f2fs_sb_has_quota_ino(sbi->sb))
> > + return true;
> > + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[USRQUOTA] ||
> > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[GRPQUOTA] ||
> > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_qf_names[PRJQUOTA])
> > + return true;
> > +#endif
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> I checked dev branch, and found one patch we didn't send to mailing list,
> could you please send it out?
>
> f2fs: fix wrong #endif
>
> I think my quota patch caused this 'wrong #endif' issue, could you add
> single line comment to notice which #if the last #endif is corresponding
> to? so that we can avoid same mistake as quota patch made.
Ah, I forgot to post the patch. It's quite late but obvious, and thus let me
keep the patch as is in order to avoid messing up the commit history.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists