[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D17B4425@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:49:11 +0000
From: Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
CC: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"lkp@...org" <lkp@...org>
Subject: RE: [LKP] [mac80211] c752cac9db: hwsim.ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif.fail
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kernel test robot [mailto:rong.a.chen@...el.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 3:05 PM
> To: Tony Chuang
> Cc: Johannes Berg; Larry Finger; LKML; Linus Torvalds; lkp@...org
> Subject: [LKP] [mac80211] c752cac9db:
> hwsim.ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif.fail
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-8):
>
> commit: c752cac9db1b0c469db7ba9d17af4ba708984db5 ("mac80211: fix
> GFP_KERNEL under tasklet context")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> in testcase: hwsim
> with following parameters:
>
> group: hwsim-02
>
>
>
> on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2
> -m 4G
>
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire
> log/backtrace):
>
<...>
>
> 2019-03-06 14:51:15 ./run-tests.py ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss
> DEV: wlan0: 02:00:00:00:00:00
> DEV: wlan1: 02:00:00:00:01:00
> DEV: wlan2: 02:00:00:00:02:00
> APDEV: wlan3
> APDEV: wlan4
> START ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss 1/1
> Test: AP VLAN operation in multi-BSS multi-VLAN case
> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> Starting AP wlan4
> Starting interface wlan3
> Connect STA wlan0 to AP
> Connect STA wlan1 to AP
> wlan0 -> VLAN 2
> test wlan1 == VLAN 1
> wlan1 -> VLAN 2
> test wlan0 == VLAN 2
> PASS ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss 3.037115 2019-03-06 14:51:19.362536
> passed all 1 test case(s)
> 2019-03-06 14:51:19 ./run-tests.py
> ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
> DEV: wlan0: 02:00:00:00:00:00
> DEV: wlan1: 02:00:00:00:01:00
> DEV: wlan2: 02:00:00:00:02:00
> APDEV: wlan3
> APDEV: wlan4
> START ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif 1/1
> Test: AP VLAN operation in multi-BSS multi-VLAN case with per-sta-vif set
> Starting AP wlan4
> Starting interface wlan3
> Connect STA wlan0 to AP
> Connect STA wlan1 to AP
> dev1->dev2 unicast data delivery failed
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./run-tests.py", line 466, in main
> t(dev, apdev)
> File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/test_ap_vlan.py", line 505, in
> test_ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
> 'multi-bss-iface-per_sta_vif.conf')
> File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/test_ap_vlan.py", line 413, in
> ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss
> hwsim_utils.test_connectivity_iface(dev[1], hapd1, "brvlan1")
> File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/hwsim_utils.py", line 176, in
> test_connectivity_iface
> max_tries=max_tries, timeout=timeout)
> File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/hwsim_utils.py", line 169, in
> test_connectivity
> raise Exception(last_err)
> Exception: dev1->dev2 unicast data delivery failed
> FAIL ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif 6.917146 2019-03-06
> 14:51:26.784664
> passed 0 test case(s)
> skipped 0 test case(s)
> failed tests: ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
<...>
>
>
> To reproduce:
>
> # build kernel
> cd linux
> cp config-4.19.0-12453-gc752cac .config
> make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig
> make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 prepare
> make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 modules_prepare
> make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
> make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 bzImage
>
>
> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
> cd lkp-tests
> bin/lkp qemu -k <bzImage> job-script # job-script is attached in this
> email
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rong Chen
It looks really strange that this patch failed the test.
And I checked the dmesg, the log shows me that
PASS ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
At line 24000.
So I think I need to reproduce this to confirm it.
Or anyone has any idea please let me know.
Thanks
Yan-Hsuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists