[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190307075916.GQ25100@shao2-debian>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:59:16 +0800
From: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>
Cc: "lkp@...org" <lkp@...org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mac80211] c752cac9db:
hwsim.ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif.fail
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 07:49:11AM +0000, Tony Chuang wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kernel test robot [mailto:rong.a.chen@...el.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 3:05 PM
> > To: Tony Chuang
> > Cc: Johannes Berg; Larry Finger; LKML; Linus Torvalds; lkp@...org
> > Subject: [LKP] [mac80211] c752cac9db:
> > hwsim.ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif.fail
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-8):
> >
> > commit: c752cac9db1b0c469db7ba9d17af4ba708984db5 ("mac80211: fix
> > GFP_KERNEL under tasklet context")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> >
> > in testcase: hwsim
> > with following parameters:
> >
> > group: hwsim-02
> >
> >
> >
> > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2
> > -m 4G
> >
> > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire
> > log/backtrace):
> >
>
> <...>
>
> >
> > 2019-03-06 14:51:15 ./run-tests.py ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss
> > DEV: wlan0: 02:00:00:00:00:00
> > DEV: wlan1: 02:00:00:00:01:00
> > DEV: wlan2: 02:00:00:00:02:00
> > APDEV: wlan3
> > APDEV: wlan4
> > START ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss 1/1
> > Test: AP VLAN operation in multi-BSS multi-VLAN case
> > RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> > Starting AP wlan4
> > Starting interface wlan3
> > Connect STA wlan0 to AP
> > Connect STA wlan1 to AP
> > wlan0 -> VLAN 2
> > test wlan1 == VLAN 1
> > wlan1 -> VLAN 2
> > test wlan0 == VLAN 2
> > PASS ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss 3.037115 2019-03-06 14:51:19.362536
> > passed all 1 test case(s)
> > 2019-03-06 14:51:19 ./run-tests.py
> > ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
> > DEV: wlan0: 02:00:00:00:00:00
> > DEV: wlan1: 02:00:00:00:01:00
> > DEV: wlan2: 02:00:00:00:02:00
> > APDEV: wlan3
> > APDEV: wlan4
> > START ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif 1/1
> > Test: AP VLAN operation in multi-BSS multi-VLAN case with per-sta-vif set
> > Starting AP wlan4
> > Starting interface wlan3
> > Connect STA wlan0 to AP
> > Connect STA wlan1 to AP
> > dev1->dev2 unicast data delivery failed
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "./run-tests.py", line 466, in main
> > t(dev, apdev)
> > File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/test_ap_vlan.py", line 505, in
> > test_ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
> > 'multi-bss-iface-per_sta_vif.conf')
> > File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/test_ap_vlan.py", line 413, in
> > ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss
> > hwsim_utils.test_connectivity_iface(dev[1], hapd1, "brvlan1")
> > File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/hwsim_utils.py", line 176, in
> > test_connectivity_iface
> > max_tries=max_tries, timeout=timeout)
> > File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/hwsim_utils.py", line 169, in
> > test_connectivity
> > raise Exception(last_err)
> > Exception: dev1->dev2 unicast data delivery failed
> > FAIL ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif 6.917146 2019-03-06
> > 14:51:26.784664
> > passed 0 test case(s)
> > skipped 0 test case(s)
> > failed tests: ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
>
> <...>
>
> >
> >
> > To reproduce:
> >
> > # build kernel
> > cd linux
> > cp config-4.19.0-12453-gc752cac .config
> > make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig
> > make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 prepare
> > make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 modules_prepare
> > make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
> > make HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 ARCH=x86_64 bzImage
> >
> >
> > git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
> > cd lkp-tests
> > bin/lkp qemu -k <bzImage> job-script # job-script is attached in this
> > email
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rong Chen
>
>
> It looks really strange that this patch failed the test.
> And I checked the dmesg, the log shows me that
>
> PASS ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
>
> At line 24000.
Hi,
This doesn't happen every time. Here is a bad result:
2019-03-06 14:51:19 ./run-tests.py ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
DEV: wlan0: 02:00:00:00:00:00
DEV: wlan1: 02:00:00:00:01:00
DEV: wlan2: 02:00:00:00:02:00
APDEV: wlan3
APDEV: wlan4
START ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif 1/1
Test: AP VLAN operation in multi-BSS multi-VLAN case with per-sta-vif set
Starting AP wlan4
Starting interface wlan3
Connect STA wlan0 to AP
Connect STA wlan1 to AP
dev1->dev2 unicast data delivery failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./run-tests.py", line 466, in main
t(dev, apdev)
File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/test_ap_vlan.py", line 505, in test_ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
'multi-bss-iface-per_sta_vif.conf')
File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/test_ap_vlan.py", line 413, in ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss
hwsim_utils.test_connectivity_iface(dev[1], hapd1, "brvlan1")
File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/hwsim_utils.py", line 176, in test_connectivity_iface
max_tries=max_tries, timeout=timeout)
File "/lkp/benchmarks/hwsim/tests/hwsim/hwsim_utils.py", line 169, in test_connectivity
raise Exception(last_err)
Exception: dev1->dev2 unicast data delivery failed
FAIL ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif 6.917146 2019-03-06 14:51:26.784664
passed 0 test case(s)
skipped 0 test case(s)
failed tests: ap_vlan_iface_cleanup_multibss_per_sta_vif
81c5dce2cd0bb0ec c752cac9db1b0c469db7ba9d17a
---------------- ---------------------------
fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
| | |
:90 11% 10:91 hwsim.ap_wpa2_eap_aka_sql.fail
:90 9% 8:91 stderr.Failed_to_connect_to_hostapd-wpa_ctrl_open:No_such_file_or_directory
90:90 -100% :91 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h
:90 6% 5:91 dmesg.RIP:__ieee80211_beacon_get[mac80211]
:90 1% 1:91 dmesg.RIP:console_unlock
:90 6% 5:91 dmesg.WARNING:at_net/mac80211/tx.c:#__ieee80211_beacon_get/0x
90:90 -94% 5:91 dmesg.boot_failures
21732:90 -24148% :91 dmesg.timestamp:BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h
:90 14125% 12712:91 dmesg.timestamp:RIP:__ieee80211_beacon_get[mac80211]
:90 3137% 2822:91 dmesg.timestamp:RIP:console_unlock
:90 14125% 12712:91 dmesg.timestamp:WARNING:at_net/mac80211/tx.c:#__ieee80211_beacon_get/0x
22439:90 70264% 85676:91 dmesg.timestamp:last
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
>
> So I think I need to reproduce this to confirm it.
> Or anyone has any idea please let me know.
> Thanks
>
> Yan-Hsuan
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list
> LKP@...ts.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists