[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f57620e8-e6d5-70e5-4da5-e86b687311b0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:26:26 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] perf record: implement -z,--compression_level=n
option and compression
On 05.03.2019 15:26, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:58:32PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> +static size_t record__process_comp_header(void *record, size_t increment)
>> +{
>> + struct compressed_event *event = record;
>> + size_t size = sizeof(struct compressed_event);
>> +
>> + if (increment) {
>> + event->header.size += increment;
>> + return increment;
>> + } else {
>> + event->header.type = PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED;
>> + event->header.size = size;
>> + return size;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static size_t record__zstd_compress(void *data, void *dst, size_t dst_size,
>
> we use the <name>__ to mark 'struct' related function,
> which supposed to be the first argument.. IMO zstd_compress
> will be fine in here
in v7.
~Alexey
>
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists