[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190307115159.617088405@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 12:45:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
julien.thierry@....com, will.deacon@....com, luto@...capital.net,
mingo@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com,
valentin.schneider@....com, brgerst@...il.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dvlasenk@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/20] x86/uaccess: Always inline user_access_begin()
If GCC out-of-lines it, the STAC and CLAC are in different fuctions
and objtool gets upset.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ extern struct movsl_mask {
* checking before using them, but you have to surround them with the
* user_access_begin/end() pair.
*/
-static __must_check inline bool user_access_begin(const void __user *ptr, size_t len)
+static __must_check __always_inline bool user_access_begin(const void __user *ptr, size_t len)
{
if (unlikely(!access_ok(ptr,len)))
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists