| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190307115200.605521081@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 12:45:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
julien.thierry@....com, will.deacon@....com, luto@...capital.net,
mingo@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com,
valentin.schneider@....com, brgerst@...il.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dvlasenk@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/20] objtool: Fix sibling call detection
It turned out that we failed to detect some sibling calls;
specifically those without relocation records; like:
$ ./objdump-func.sh defconfig-build/mm/kasan/generic.o __asan_loadN
0000 0000000000000840 <__asan_loadN>:
0000 840: 48 8b 0c 24 mov (%rsp),%rcx
0004 844: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
0006 846: e9 45 fe ff ff jmpq 690 <check_memory_region>
So extend the cross-function jump to also consider those that are not
between known (or newly detected) parent/child functions, as
sibling-cals when they jump to the start of the function.
The second part of that condition is to deal with random jumps to the
middle of other function, as can be found in
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S for example.
This then (with later patches applied) makes the above recognise the
sibling call:
mm/kasan/generic.o: warning: objtool: __asan_loadN()+0x6: call to check_memory_region() with UACCESS enabled
Also make sure to set insn->call_dest for sibling calls so we can know
who we're calling.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
continue;
} else {
/* sibling call */
- insn->jump_dest = 0;
+ insn->call_dest = rela->sym;
+ insn->jump_dest = NULL;
continue;
}
@@ -537,25 +538,38 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
}
/*
- * For GCC 8+, create parent/child links for any cold
- * subfunctions. This is _mostly_ redundant with a similar
- * initialization in read_symbols().
- *
- * If a function has aliases, we want the *first* such function
- * in the symbol table to be the subfunction's parent. In that
- * case we overwrite the initialization done in read_symbols().
- *
- * However this code can't completely replace the
- * read_symbols() code because this doesn't detect the case
- * where the parent function's only reference to a subfunction
- * is through a switch table.
+ * Cross-function jump.
*/
if (insn->func && insn->jump_dest->func &&
- insn->func != insn->jump_dest->func &&
- !strstr(insn->func->name, ".cold.") &&
- strstr(insn->jump_dest->func->name, ".cold.")) {
- insn->func->cfunc = insn->jump_dest->func;
- insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc = insn->func;
+ insn->func != insn->jump_dest->func) {
+
+ /*
+ * For GCC 8+, create parent/child links for any cold
+ * subfunctions. This is _mostly_ redundant with a
+ * similar initialization in read_symbols().
+ *
+ * If a function has aliases, we want the *first* such
+ * function in the symbol table to be the subfunction's
+ * parent. In that case we overwrite the
+ * initialization done in read_symbols().
+ *
+ * However this code can't completely replace the
+ * read_symbols() code because this doesn't detect the
+ * case where the parent function's only reference to a
+ * subfunction is through a switch table.
+ */
+ if (!strstr(insn->func->name, ".cold.") &&
+ strstr(insn->jump_dest->func->name, ".cold.")) {
+ insn->func->cfunc = insn->jump_dest->func;
+ insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc = insn->func;
+
+ } else if (insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc != insn->func->pfunc &&
+ insn->jump_dest->offset == insn->jump_dest->func->offset) {
+
+ /* sibling class */
+ insn->call_dest = insn->jump_dest->func;
+ insn->jump_dest = NULL;
+ }
}
}
@@ -1935,9 +1949,16 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
case INSN_JUMP_CONDITIONAL:
case INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL:
- if (insn->jump_dest &&
- (!func || !insn->jump_dest->func ||
- insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc == func)) {
+ if (func && !insn->jump_dest) {
+do_sibling_call:
+ if (has_modified_stack_frame(&state)) {
+ WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame",
+ sec, insn->offset);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ } else if (insn->jump_dest &&
+ (!func || !insn->jump_dest->func ||
+ insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc == func)) {
ret = validate_branch(file, insn->jump_dest,
state);
if (ret) {
@@ -1945,25 +1966,17 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
BT_FUNC("(branch)", insn);
return ret;
}
-
- } else if (func && has_modified_stack_frame(&state)) {
- WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame",
- sec, insn->offset);
- return 1;
}
- if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL)
+ if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL ||
+ insn->type == INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC)
return 0;
break;
case INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC:
- if (func && list_empty(&insn->alts) &&
- has_modified_stack_frame(&state)) {
- WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame",
- sec, insn->offset);
- return 1;
- }
+ if (func && list_empty(&insn->alts))
+ goto do_sibling_call;
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists