[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190307191840.GC138592@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:18:40 -0800
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Harish Bandi <c-hbandi@...eaurora.org>
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
hemantg@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
bgodavar@...eaurora.org, anubhavg@...eaurora.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Enable Bluetooth functionality for wcn3998.
+ device tree folks
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:46:50PM +0530, Harish Bandi wrote:
> This patch series we add support for wcn3998 BT chip set. This new chipset
> is based from the wcn3990 with minimal power numbers. So here in this patch
> The major difference between wcn3990 and wcn3998 is only power numbers. where
> as init process and fw download is same with wcn3990.So we are leveraging the
> existing code of wcn3990 along with readiing the voltages from the dts file.
About how many different variants are we talking?
Couldn't you just use a different compatible string for each variant
and specify the voltage/current limits in the hci_qca.c driver, as
currently done for the WCN3990? I understand that it requires touching
the driver for each new variant, but it might be preferable to specify
these static values in a single location, instead of repeating them in
the DT snippets of every device that uses such a controller, with the
possiblity of configuration errors.
The DT folks can probably provide guidance on what is typically done
in cases like this.
Thanks
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists