lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 07 Mar 2019 20:19:47 +0100
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: pxa2xx: remove incorrect __init annotation

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages() is marked __init but usually inlined into
> the non-__init pxa_cpufreq_init() function. When building with clang,
> it can stay as a standalone function in a discarded section, and produce
> this warning:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x616a00): Section mismatch in reference from the function pxa_cpufreq_init() to the function .init.text:pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages()
> The function pxa_cpufreq_init() references
> the function __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages().
> This is often because pxa_cpufreq_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages is wrong.
>
> Fixes: 50e77fcd790e ("ARM: pxa: remove __init from cpufreq_driver->init()")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ