linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RAS updates for 5.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjESdzE5YRYny25yhMvKP24omiRAJ2PMbqOdh7HwjKJAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:14:32 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RAS updates for 5.1

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:16 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
>
> please pull the latest ras-core-for-linus tree from:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git ras-core-for-linus

Hmm. You use signed tags for the EDAC tree, but not the RAS one. Is
there a reason for that oddity?

Not a big deal for a kernel.org tree, but I do prefer them signed even there.

Regardless - pulled, just wondering,

               Linus