linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RAS updates for 5.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 18:35:29 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RAS updates for 5.1

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 09:14:32AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. You use signed tags for the EDAC tree, but not the RAS one. Is
> there a reason for that oddity?

Well, tip guys don't do signed tags but they name the top commit. I've
forgotten to do that, here it is:

# HEAD: 41f035a86b5b72a4f947c38e94239d20d595352a x86/mce: Improve error message when kernel cannot recover, p2

Sorry about that and thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)