[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190309110217.GA5281@bigcity.dyn.berto.se>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 12:02:17 +0100
From: Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
To: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Cc: pakki001@....edu, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rcar-vin: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference
Hi Kangjie,
Thanks for your patch.
On 2019-03-09 01:05:27 -0600, Kangjie Lu wrote:
> In case of_match_node cannot find a match, the fix returns
> -EINVAL to avoid NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> index f0719ce24b97..a058e2023ca8 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static int rvin_group_init(struct rvin_group *group, struct rvin_dev *vin)
>
> match = of_match_node(vin->dev->driver->of_match_table,
> vin->dev->of_node);
> + if (unlikely(!match))
> + return -EINVAL;
I don't think this is needed. The driver depends on selects OF and if we
get this far we it is because we had a match already. The reason to call
of_match_node() here is simply to retrieve which of the possible
compatible strings was matched.
Am I missing something? What scenario do you see where this can fail?
>
> strscpy(mdev->driver_name, KBUILD_MODNAME, sizeof(mdev->driver_name));
> strscpy(mdev->model, match->compatible, sizeof(mdev->model));
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
Powered by blists - more mailing lists