[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YLZYJ21Bao5HVAvXhvb9PQ41J-4RvtkZZEMF38qtkxHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:36:12 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dbueso@...e.de,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: WARNING in ep_poll_callback
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-11 14:45, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 2:37 PM Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@...e.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> I thought "epoll: loosen irq safety in ep_poll_callback()" patch was
> >> removed from your tree, at least I got a notification on 9th of
> >> january,
> >> also I do not see it in the linux-next tree.
> >>
> >> Should I ignore this syzbot message?
> >
> > If this was resolved we need to communicate it to syzbot one way or the
> > other.
> > Since it was in linux-next, it won't even be able to do fix bisection.
> > So the bug will be open forever otherwise.
>
> Bug was fixed (commit was simply dropped). How can I tell syzbot to
> shut up
> and to resolve the issue?
Hi Roman,
The docs are at:
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
There is no official support for bugs fixed not by commit merges.
Linux-next creates various interesting corner-cases for the process.
Let's go with this option for now:
#syz invalid
Powered by blists - more mailing lists