lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190312023828.GH19508@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:38:28 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm: Use slab_list list_head instead of lru

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:05:54PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > slab_list and lru are in the same bits.  Once this patch set is in,
> > we can remove the enigmatic 'uses lru' comment that I added.
> 
> Funny you should say this, I came to me today while daydreaming that I
> should have removed that comment :)
> 
> I'll remove it in v2.

That's great.  BTW, something else you could do to verify this patch
set is check that the object file is unchanged before/after the patch.
I tend to use 'objdump -dr' to before.s and after.s and use 'diff'
to compare the two.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ