[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190312023828.GH19508@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:38:28 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm: Use slab_list list_head instead of lru
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:05:54PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > slab_list and lru are in the same bits. Once this patch set is in,
> > we can remove the enigmatic 'uses lru' comment that I added.
>
> Funny you should say this, I came to me today while daydreaming that I
> should have removed that comment :)
>
> I'll remove it in v2.
That's great. BTW, something else you could do to verify this patch
set is check that the object file is unchanged before/after the patch.
I tend to use 'objdump -dr' to before.s and after.s and use 'diff'
to compare the two.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists