[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27680.1552376873@turing-police>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:47:53 -0400
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c - make local symbols static
With 'make C=2 W=1', sparse and gcc both complain:
CHECK arch/x86/mm/pti.c
arch/x86/mm/pti.c:84:3: warning: symbol 'pti_mode' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/mm/pti.c:605:6: warning: symbol 'pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal' was not declared. Should it be static?
CC arch/x86/mm/pti.o
arch/x86/mm/pti.c:605:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
605 | void pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And indeed, the function at line 605 is only used locally. 'pti_mode' is more
subtle - there is another pti_mode in drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/pti.c, but
it's an array declared static, not an enum
Make both variables static.
Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
index 4fee5c3003ed..139b28a01ce4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void __init pti_print_if_secure(const char *reason)
pr_info("%s\n", reason);
}
-enum pti_mode {
+static enum pti_mode {
PTI_AUTO = 0,
PTI_FORCE_OFF,
PTI_FORCE_ON
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void pti_clone_kernel_text(void)
set_memory_global(start, (end_global - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
-void pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal(void)
+static void pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal(void)
{
/*
* The identity map is created with PMDs, regardless of the
Powered by blists - more mailing lists