[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36d37d88-4460-e2bb-4f09-07693ddb5831@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:02:17 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c - make local symbols static
> Make both variables static.
"pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal(void)" is an awfully funny looking
variable. ;)
> Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> index 4fee5c3003ed..139b28a01ce4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void __init pti_print_if_secure(const char *reason)
> pr_info("%s\n", reason);
> }
>
> -enum pti_mode {
> +static enum pti_mode {
I'm struggling to figure out why we would want to do this. If there's a
really good reason, I think we probably need to do it en masse:
$ grep -r '^enum.{' arch/x86/ | wc -l
48
> PTI_AUTO = 0,
> PTI_FORCE_OFF,
> PTI_FORCE_ON
> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void pti_clone_kernel_text(void)
> set_memory_global(start, (end_global - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> }
>
> -void pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal(void)
> +static void pti_set_kernel_image_nonglobal(void)
Yes, this function should be static.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists