linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: drm: atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:14:43 +0200
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: drm: atomic_helper: Fix spelling errors

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:33:07AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Trivial fixes identified while working on the DRM code.
> 
>   s/artifically/artificially/
>   s/achive/achieve/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: - Actually spell achieve correctly!

drm convention is to put this above the --- so that it gets included in
the commit msg.

With that
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>

> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index 540a77a2ade9..2453678d1186 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 *
>  	 * NOTE: Commit work has multiple phases, first hardware commit, then
>  	 * cleanup. We want them to overlap, hence need system_unbound_wq to
> -	 * make sure work items don't artifically stall on each another.
> +	 * make sure work items don't artificially stall on each another.
>  	 */
>  
>  	drm_atomic_state_get(state);
> @@ -1786,7 +1786,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_commit);
>   *
>   * Asynchronous workers need to have sufficient parallelism to be able to run
>   * different atomic commits on different CRTCs in parallel. The simplest way to
> - * achive this is by running them on the &system_unbound_wq work queue. Note
> + * achieve this is by running them on the &system_unbound_wq work queue. Note
>   * that drivers are not required to split up atomic commits and run an
>   * individual commit in parallel - userspace is supposed to do that if it cares.
>   * But it might be beneficial to do that for modesets, since those necessarily
> -- 
> 2.19.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel