lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUBZRxE-E8T03C85B5-UeM+ofLSbZhyRKWHrcmQksQvag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:59:33 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fix SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK() regression

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:01 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> Geert points out that I confused the min/max arguments that are
> reversed between SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK() and GENMASK(). This time
> I have verified the result of the macro after fixing the arguments.
>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Fixes: eefffb42f665 ("spi: work around clang bug in SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK()")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ