[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190313210118.3507256-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:00:34 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: fix SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK() regression
Geert points out that I confused the min/max arguments that are
reversed between SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK() and GENMASK(). This time
I have verified the result of the macro after fixing the arguments.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Fixes: eefffb42f665 ("spi: work around clang bug in SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK()")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
The broken commit is currently in the for-5.2 branch of the spi
tree. If this is a branch that gets rebased, please just fold this
fix into the original patch
---
include/linux/spi/spi.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
index b27386450089..a0975cf76cf6 100644
--- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ struct spi_controller {
/* bitmask of supported bits_per_word for transfers */
u32 bits_per_word_mask;
#define SPI_BPW_MASK(bits) BIT((bits) - 1)
-#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((min) - 1, (max) - 1)
+#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((max) - 1, (min) - 1)
/* limits on transfer speed */
u32 min_speed_hz;
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists