linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: drm: atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190313155936.GM3888@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:59:36 +0200
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: drm: atomic_helper: Fix spelling errors

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 03:59:15PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Ville,
> 
> On 12/03/2019 15:14, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:33:07AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> >> Trivial fixes identified while working on the DRM code.
> >>
> >>   s/artifically/artificially/
> >>   s/achive/achieve/
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v2: - Actually spell achieve correctly!
> > 
> > drm convention is to put this above the --- so that it gets included in
> > the commit msg.
> 
> Oh - in linux-media these are just dropped.
> 
> I'll try to remember this for my future work in DRM.
> 
> I don't have commit access anyway, so can I presume whomever will pick
> this up will adjust if necessary?

Ah. Yeah, it's fine. Now pushed with the adjustement. Thanks for the
patch.

> 
> Or should I repost? (which might be a bit redundant just to move a patch
> version comment which would then increase again :D )
> 
> 
> > With that
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Regards
> 
> Kieran
> 
> 
> > 
> >>
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> >> index 540a77a2ade9..2453678d1186 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> >> @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
> >>  	 *
> >>  	 * NOTE: Commit work has multiple phases, first hardware commit, then
> >>  	 * cleanup. We want them to overlap, hence need system_unbound_wq to
> >> -	 * make sure work items don't artifically stall on each another.
> >> +	 * make sure work items don't artificially stall on each another.
> >>  	 */
> >>  
> >>  	drm_atomic_state_get(state);
> >> @@ -1786,7 +1786,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_commit);
> >>   *
> >>   * Asynchronous workers need to have sufficient parallelism to be able to run
> >>   * different atomic commits on different CRTCs in parallel. The simplest way to
> >> - * achive this is by running them on the &system_unbound_wq work queue. Note
> >> + * achieve this is by running them on the &system_unbound_wq work queue. Note
> >>   * that drivers are not required to split up atomic commits and run an
> >>   * individual commit in parallel - userspace is supposed to do that if it cares.
> >>   * But it might be beneficial to do that for modesets, since those necessarily
> >> -- 
> >> 2.19.1
> > 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel