lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fee1ca34-eaa4-75c4-60bb-72a7b18fdd1a@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:55:29 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/12] perf report: implement record trace
 decompression


On 13.03.2019 17:37, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 08:36:18AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> SBIP
> 
>> +#ifdef HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT
>> +static int perf_session__process_compressed_event(struct perf_session *session,
>> +					union perf_event *event, u64 file_offset)
>> +{
>> +	void *src;
>> +	size_t decomp_size, src_size;
>> +	u64 decomp_last_rem = 0;
>> +	size_t decomp_len = session->header.env.comp_mmap_len;
>> +	struct decomp *decomp, *decomp_last = session->decomp_last;
>> +
>> +	decomp = mmap(NULL, sizeof(struct decomp) + decomp_len, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
>> +		      MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
>> +	if (decomp == MAP_FAILED) {
>> +		pr_err("Couldn't allocate memory for decompression\n");
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
> 
> ok, I see the need to keep this decomp around, we need the event
> to be there the whole time, like the mmap for the standard events
> 
> we know the total uncompressed size when record is done, right?
> could we save it in the COMPRESSED feature and alloc all the
> needed uncompressed data in single mmap?

It can be not that good idea. The required contiguous memory 
region can be really huge to be allocated. Plain malloc()'s are 
also not good. I was observing OOM in perf report process when 
loading traces of several GiBs. So smaller, page size granularity,
linked memory regions performed the best in my experiments.

~Alexey

> 
> jirka
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ