linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: Use of_node_name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CwxZv=kAiqZ7YE2eRV1tTA13xbz1czUXOiScBoBfk75A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:36:35 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Use of_node_name_eq for node name comparisons

Hi Lucas,

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:22 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> wrote:

> Unfortunately this change causes a regression on systems with MC13xxx
> regulators. The desc.name field is filled with an uppercase name of the
> regulator, while the existing DTs (as far as I know) all use lowercase
> node names, so the matching in the function above doesn't work anymore.
>
> Any opinions about how to proceed here?

Does this patch fix the problem?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20190306&id=ec520911ecc7eaf01a