[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1552499485.2453.53.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:51:25 +0100
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Use of_node_name_eq for node name comparisons
Hi Fabio,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.03.2019, 14:36 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:22 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately this change causes a regression on systems with MC13xxx
> > regulators. The desc.name field is filled with an uppercase name of the
> > regulator, while the existing DTs (as far as I know) all use lowercase
> > node names, so the matching in the function above doesn't work anymore.
> >
> > Any opinions about how to proceed here?
>
> Does this patch fix the problem?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20190306&id=ec520911ecc7eaf01a
I wasn't aware of this patch. I haven't tested it yet, but this looks
like it should fix the problem. I just wasn't sure if that's the route
we want to go, as I don't know if there are any out of tree DTs that
use uppercase node names.
But as there seems to be agreement to just change the regulator names
to lowercase, I consider this issue fixed.
Regards,
Lucas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists