[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190314071245.GA2001@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:12:45 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cifs: remove unused status severity defines
On (03/14/19 02:04), Steve French wrote:
[..]
> #define STATUS_SEVERITY_SUCCESS __constant_cpu_to_le32(0x0000)
Does STATUS_SEVERITY_SUCCESS still use __constant_cpu_to_le32?
> -#define STATUS_SEVERITY_INFORMATIONAL __constanst_cpu_to_le32(0x0001)
> -#define STATUS_SEVERITY_WARNING __constanst_cpu_to_le32(0x0002)
> -#define STATUS_SEVERITY_ERROR __constanst_cpu_to_le32(0x0003)
> +#define STATUS_SEVERITY_INFORMATIONAL cpu_to_le32(0x0001)
> +#define STATUS_SEVERITY_WARNING cpu_to_le32(0x0002)
> +#define STATUS_SEVERITY_ERROR cpu_to_le32(0x0003)
Otherwise looks good.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists