[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10d65087-2ae5-8ddf-e9be-02c9341b452b@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:05:51 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] leds: netdev trigger: allow setting initial values
in device tree
On 14/03/2019 15.24, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Rasmus,
>
> Thank you for the update.
> Still, there is one thing to improve.
>
>> static int netdev_trig_activate(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>> {
>> struct led_netdev_data *trigger_data;
>> @@ -423,6 +451,8 @@ static int netdev_trig_activate(struct
>> led_classdev *led_cdev)
>> trigger_data->mode = 0;
>> atomic_set(&trigger_data->interval, msecs_to_jiffies(50));
>> trigger_data->last_activity = 0;
>> + if (led_cdev->flags & LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER)
>> + netdev_trig_of_init(led_cdev, trigger_data);
>
> We don't necessarily want OF settings to be used for initialization on
> each LED trigger activation for the LED class device, but only on the
> first one. That's why the triggers using this flags clean it here:
>
> led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER;
Right, I noticed that pattern, but wondered about it. If this is
supposed to be a general thing, why isn't it just done by the trigger
core after the call of led_trigger_set() in the two places the bit gets
set? I.e.
led_cdev->flags |= LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER;
led_trigger_set(led_cdev, trig);
+ led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER;
I can certainly add clearing the flag to my code, just wondering.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists