[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ddc53d4c-3da8-3f00-12dc-51df4a149bcf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:36:45 +0100
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] leds: netdev trigger: allow setting initial values
in device tree
On 3/14/19 4:05 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 14/03/2019 15.24, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Rasmus,
>>
>> Thank you for the update.
>> Still, there is one thing to improve.
>>
>
>>> static int netdev_trig_activate(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>>> {
>>> struct led_netdev_data *trigger_data;
>>> @@ -423,6 +451,8 @@ static int netdev_trig_activate(struct
>>> led_classdev *led_cdev)
>>> trigger_data->mode = 0;
>>> atomic_set(&trigger_data->interval, msecs_to_jiffies(50));
>>> trigger_data->last_activity = 0;
>>> + if (led_cdev->flags & LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER)
>>> + netdev_trig_of_init(led_cdev, trigger_data);
>>
>> We don't necessarily want OF settings to be used for initialization on
>> each LED trigger activation for the LED class device, but only on the
>> first one. That's why the triggers using this flags clean it here:
>>
>> led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER;
>
> Right, I noticed that pattern, but wondered about it. If this is
> supposed to be a general thing, why isn't it just done by the trigger
> core after the call of led_trigger_set() in the two places the bit gets
> set? I.e.
>
> led_cdev->flags |= LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER;
> led_trigger_set(led_cdev, trig);
> + led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_INIT_DEFAULT_TRIGGER;
>
> I can certainly add clearing the flag to my code, just wondering.
Good point. It would have to be applied in both
led_trigger_set_default() and led_trigger_register(). So you either
need to add generic support for clearing the flag (and update the three
users) or update your patch alone.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists