[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190314154911.GE24002@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:49:11 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>,
Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@...ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/8] perf tools: Get precise_ip from the pmu config
> > Still seems like a hack. Even though I don't know of a case that
> > would break now. But it would be better to have the precise probing
> > in the open retry loop, instead of trying to reinvent it here.
>
> how about something like below?
Yes looks reasonable.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists