[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190314221943.GQ4102@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:19:43 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Eial Czerwacki <eial@...lemp.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shai Fultheim <shai@...lemp.com>,
Oren Twaig <oren@...lemp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu/module resevation: change resevation size iff
X86_VSMP is set
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:36:19AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:11:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > commit 34f67df09cc0c6bf082a7cfca435373caeeb8d82
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed Mar 13 16:06:22 2019 -0700
> >
> > srcu: Forbid DEFINE{,_STATIC}_SRCU() from modules
> >
> > Adding DEFINE_SRCU() or DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() to a loadable module
> > requires that the size of the reserved region be increased, which is
> > not something we want to be doing all that often. Instead, loadable
> > modules should define an srcu_struct and invoke init_srcu_struct()
> > from their module_init function and cleanup_srcu_struct() from their
> > module_exit function. Note that modules using call_srcu() will also
> > need to invoke srcu_barrier() from their module_exit function.
> >
> > This commit enforces this advice by refusing to define DEFINE_SRCU()
> > and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() within loadable modules.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Looks-great-to-me-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Applied. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks. :)
>
> --
> tejun
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists