[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190315232609.GM24002@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:26:09 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] perf: Support a new coresum event qualifier
> Yes, the coresum's behavior is similar as --per-core option, just supports
> at the event level. I'm OK with calling it 'per-core'.
>
> For example,
> perf stat -e cpu/event=0,umask=0x3,per-core=1/
Please use percore, the - would need to be escaped in metric expressions.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists