linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] perf: Support a new coresum event qualifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5e46a9a5-8d85-d14a-4ed2-87feb7ab95e1@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Mar 2019 07:31:13 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] perf: Support a new coresum event qualifier



On 3/16/2019 7:26 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Yes, the coresum's behavior is similar as --per-core option, just supports
>> at the event level. I'm OK with calling it 'per-core'.
>>
>> For example,
>> perf stat -e cpu/event=0,umask=0x3,per-core=1/
> 
> Please use percore, the - would need to be escaped in metric expressions.
> 
> -Andi
> 

Oh, yes, thanks for reminding. Will use 'percore' in next version.

Thanks
Jin Yao