lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:25:20 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/15] drm/sun4i: dsi: Fix video start delay
 computation

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:31:11PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:07 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 07:06:23PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Vertical video start delay is computed by excluding vertical front
> > > porch value from total vertical timings.
> > >
> > > This clearly confirmed from BSP code and here how it computed,
> > >
> > > (drivers/video/sunxi/disp2/disp/de/lowlevel_sun50iw1/de_dsi.c)
> > > u32 vfp = panel->lcd_vt - panel->lcd_y - panel->lcd_vbp;
> > > => (panel->lcd_vt) - panel->lcd_y - (panel->lcd_vbp)
> > > => (timmings->ver_front_porch + panel->lcd_vbp + panel->lcd_y)
> > >    - panel->lcd_y - (panel->lcd_vbp)
> > > => timmings->ver_front_porch + panel->lcd_vbp + panel->lcd_y
> > >                            - panel->lcd_y - panel->lcd_vbp
> > > => timmings->ver_front_porch
> > >
> > > But the current driver is assuming it can exclude vertical front
> > > porch along with vertical sync values from total vertical timings,
> > > which resulting wrong start delay indeed wrong picture rendering
> > > in the panel.
> >
> > Same story here: which panel, which datasheet, which "wrong picture
> > rendering"?
>
> It's bananapi,s070wv20-ct16 DSI

You're answering one out of three questions.

> > > Example: timings, where it produces the issue.
> > > {
> > >       .vdisplay       = 600,
> > >       .vsync_start    = 600 + 12,
> > >       .vsync_end      = 600 + 12 + 2,
> > >       .vtotal         = 600 + 12 + 2 + 21,
> > > }
> >
> > Can you 100% trust those timings?
>
> ie. reason, I have given the Mainline timings [1]. The above timings
> are wrongly mentioned actual timings are from [1]

You're still answering partially here. Those timings are working for
RGB, you have no proof that we need to make the same adjustments for
DSI.

> > > It produces the desired start delay value as 19 but the correct working
> > > value should be 513.
> > >
> > > So, Fix it by computing proper video start delay.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 69006ef0ecb1 ("drm/sun4i: dsi: Change the start delay calculation")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > index 62a508420227..8d6292c0158b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > @@ -364,8 +364,14 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_inst_init(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
> > >  static u16 sun6i_dsi_get_video_start_delay(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
> > >                                          struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > >  {
> > > -     u16 start = clamp(mode->vtotal - mode->vdisplay - 10, 8, 100);
> > > -     u16 delay = mode->vtotal - (mode->vsync_end - mode->vdisplay) + start;
> > > +     u16 delay = mode->vtotal - (mode->vsync_start - mode->vdisplay);
> > > +
> > > +     /**
> > > +      * BSP comment:
> > > +      * put start_delay to tcon. set ready sync early to dramfreq,
> > > +      * so set start_delay 1
> > > +      */
> >
> > That doesn't make any sense to me... What does it mean?
>
> Which is meaning as above stated as "BSP comment" from here[2]

It doesn't matter where you took it from. If you cannot explain what
happen, putting a random label that doesn't explain anything will not
help.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists