[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190319170752.jd3wavbxhodnnyb6@function>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 18:07:52 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
speakup@...ux-speakup.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Staging status of speakup
Alan Cox, le mar. 19 mars 2019 16:31:21 +0000, a ecrit:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 10:35:43 +0100
> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org> wrote:
> > Chris Brannon, le ven. 15 mars 2019 18:19:39 -0700, a ecrit:
> > > Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com> writes:
> > > > Finally there is an issue where text in output buffer sometimes gets
> > > > garbled on SMP systems, but we can continue working on it after the
> > > > driver is moved out of staging, if that's okay. Basically we need a
> > > > reproducer of this issue.
> > >
> > > What kind of reproducer do you need here? It's straightforward to
> > > reproduce in casual use, at least with a software synthesizer.
> >
> > The problem is that neither Okash nor I are even casual users of
> > speakup, so we need a walk-through of the kind of operation that
> > produces the issue. It does not have to be reproducible each time it is
> > done. Perhaps (I really don't know what that bug is about actually) it
> > is a matter of putting text in the selection buffer, and try to paste it
> > 100 times, and once every 10 times it will be garbled, for instance.
>
> paste_selection still says
The issue is not actually with pasting a selection, just plain text
output from applications.
Samuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists