lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:31:21 +0000
From:   Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:     Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc:     Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
        Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        speakup@...ux-speakup.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
        Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Staging status of speakup

On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 10:35:43 +0100
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org> wrote:

> Chris Brannon, le ven. 15 mars 2019 18:19:39 -0700, a ecrit:
> > Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com> writes:  
> > > Finally there is an issue where text in output buffer sometimes gets
> > > garbled on SMP systems, but we can continue working on it after the
> > > driver is moved out of staging, if that's okay. Basically we need a
> > > reproducer of this issue.  
> > 
> > What kind of reproducer do you need here?  It's straightforward to
> > reproduce in casual use, at least with a software synthesizer.  
> 
> The problem is that neither Okash nor I are even casual users of
> speakup, so we need a walk-through of the kind of operation that
> produces the issue. It does not have to be reproducible each time it is
> done. Perhaps (I really don't know what that bug is about actually) it
> is a matter of putting text in the selection buffer, and try to paste it
> 100 times, and once every 10 times it will be garbled, for instance.

paste_selection still says

/* Insert the contents of the selection buffer into the
 * queue of the tty associated with the current console.
 * Invoked by ioctl().
 *
 * Locking: called without locks. Calls the ldisc wrongly with
 * unsafe methods,
 */

from which I deduce that with everyone using X nobody ever bothered to
fix it. So before you look too hard at the speakup code you might want to
review the interaction with selection.c too.

Alan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ