[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1553029714.2932.43.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:08:34 -0700
From: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] security/keys/encrypted: Break module dependency
chain
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 14:01 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:18 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.c
> om> wrote:
> >
> > With v5.1-rc1 all the nvdimm sub-system regression tests started
> > failing because the libnvdimm module failed to load in the qemu-kvm
> > test environment. Critically that environment does not have a TPM.
> > Commit 240730437deb "KEYS: trusted: explicitly use tpm_chip
> > structure..." started to require a TPM to be present for the
> > trusted.ko module to load where there was no requirement for that
> > before.
> >
> > Rather than undo the "fail if no hardware" behavior James points
> > out that the module dependencies can be broken by looking up the
> > key-type by name. Remove the dependencies on the "key_type_trusted"
> > and "key_type_encrypted" symbol exports, and clean up other
> > boilerplate that supported those exports in different
> > configurations.
>
> Any feedback? Was hoping to get at least patch1 in the queue for
> v5.1-rc2 since this effectively disables the nvdimm driver on typical
> configurations. Jarkko, would you be willing to merge it since the
> regression came through your tree?
The reason I sent out the RFC was to see if the people who actually
wrote the code had any reasons they needed the current way of doing
things preserving.
I think your series looks fine except you need to export
key_type_lookup (patch 2) before you use it (patch 1) to preserve
bisectability of builds.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists