linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/sparse: Clean up the obsolete code comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190320111959.GV19508@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 04:19:59 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
        rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/sparse: Clean up the obsolete code comment

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 03:35:38PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>  /*
> - * returns the number of sections whose mem_maps were properly
> - * set.  If this is <=0, then that means that the passed-in
> - * map was not consumed and must be freed.
> + * sparse_add_one_section - add a memory section
> + * @nid:	The node to add section on
> + * @start_pfn:	start pfn of the memory range
> + * @altmap:	device page map
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success and an appropriate error code otherwise.
>   */

I think it's worth documenting what those error codes are.  Seems to be
just -ENOMEM and -EEXIST, but it'd be nice for users to know what they
can expect under which circumstances.

Also, -EEXIST is a bad errno to return here:

$ errno EEXIST
EEXIST 17 File exists

What file?  I think we should be using -EBUSY instead in case this errno
makes it back to userspace:

$ errno EBUSY
EBUSY 16 Device or resource busy