linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 06/23] perf/x86: Support constraint ranges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:09:42 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 06/23] perf/x86: Support constraint ranges

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:56:46PM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

That might be a stretch at this point...


> @@ -263,18 +268,25 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>  	void				*kfree_on_online[X86_PERF_KFREE_MAX];
>  };
>  
> -#define __EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, m, w, o, f) {\
> +#define __EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, m, w, o, f) {	\
>  	{ .idxmsk64 = (n) },		\
>  	.code = (c),			\
> +	.size = (e) - (c),		\
>  	.cmask = (m),			\
>  	.weight = (w),			\
>  	.overlap = (o),			\
>  	.flags = f,			\
>  }
>  
> +#define __EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, m, w, o, f) \
> +	__EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, c, n, m, w, o, f)
> +
>  #define EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, m)	\
>  	__EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, m, HWEIGHT(n), 0, 0)
>  
> +#define EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, m) \
> +	__EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, m, HWEIGHT(n), 0, 0)
> +

^ that one needs a comment that it doesn't work for AMD events.

>  #define INTEL_EXCLEVT_CONSTRAINT(c, n)	\
>  	__EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT, HWEIGHT(n),\
>  			   0, PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL)