[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <289f9994-0980-081e-f913-5729b16d16f4@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:24:55 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, dedekind1@...il.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ubifs: remove unused function __ubifs_shash_final
On 3/21/2019 1:48 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 21:05:37 CET schrieb Mukesh Ojha:
>> On 3/20/2019 7:39 PM, Yue Haibing wrote:
>>> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> There is no callers in tree, and can be removed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ubifs/auth.c | 18 ------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/auth.c b/fs/ubifs/auth.c
>>> index 5bf5fd0..2a40ccce 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ubifs/auth.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/auth.c
>>> @@ -147,24 +147,6 @@ struct shash_desc *__ubifs_hash_get_desc(const struct ubifs_info *c)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> - * __ubifs_shash_final - finalize shash
>>> - * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
>>> - * @desc: the descriptor
>>> - * @out: the output hash
>>> - *
>>> - * Simple wrapper around crypto_shash_final(), safe to be called with
>>> - * disabled authentication.
>>> - */
>>> -int __ubifs_shash_final(const struct ubifs_info *c, struct shash_desc *desc,
>>> - u8 *out)
>>> -{
>>> - if (ubifs_authenticated(c))
>>> - return crypto_shash_final(desc, out);
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> * ubifs_bad_hash - Report hash mismatches
>>> * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
>>> * @node: the node
>>
>>
>> Looks fine to be removed.
>>
>> Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> I guess you mean Reviewed-by?
As i am unsure about future scope of this func. i.e why Acked.
-Mukesh
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists