linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] ubifs: remove unused function __ubifs_shash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24657306.kQxLvZqZK3@blindfold>
Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:09:28 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, dedekind1@...il.com,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ubifs: remove unused function __ubifs_shash_final

Am Donnerstag, 21. März 2019, 08:54:55 CET schrieb Mukesh Ojha:
> >> Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> > I guess you mean Reviewed-by?
> 
> As i am unsure about future scope of this func. i.e why Acked.

Acked-by is usually something I expect from the code author
or the person that owns the code.

Thanks,
//richard