linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:50:43 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk_get() on orphans

On 3/6/2019 4:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-03-06 13:48:13)
>> Ping?
>>
>> Stephen, I know as this depends on your clock parent handling series
>> (happens to apply just fine to v2), its not going to be accepted until
>> that gets sorted out, but do you have any thoughts on if this seems like
>> an appropriate thing to do, or if you'd like to see a different solution?
> 
> Please don't ping during the merge window. I'll probably look at this
> patch next week.
> 

Sorry about pinging during the merge window.  At the time, I just 
realized the patch has been on list for several weeks with no response, 
but hadn't connected the dots that it happened to be the merge window at 
that particular moment.

Any update on when you think you might get around to having a look at this?

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.