[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5eaebfd5-6c46-62ac-e04a-bf68a5bccefc@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:34:51 -0600
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk_get() on orphans
On 3/21/2019 8:50 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 3/6/2019 4:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-03-06 13:48:13)
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> Stephen, I know as this depends on your clock parent handling series
>>> (happens to apply just fine to v2), its not going to be accepted until
>>> that gets sorted out, but do you have any thoughts on if this seems like
>>> an appropriate thing to do, or if you'd like to see a different
>>> solution?
>>
>> Please don't ping during the merge window. I'll probably look at this
>> patch next week.
>>
>
> Sorry about pinging during the merge window. At the time, I just
> realized the patch has been on list for several weeks with no response,
> but hadn't connected the dots that it happened to be the merge window at
> that particular moment.
>
> Any update on when you think you might get around to having a look at this?
>
Ping? (again)
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists