linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:34:51 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk_get() on orphans

On 3/21/2019 8:50 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 3/6/2019 4:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-03-06 13:48:13)
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> Stephen, I know as this depends on your clock parent handling series
>>> (happens to apply just fine to v2), its not going to be accepted until
>>> that gets sorted out, but do you have any thoughts on if this seems like
>>> an appropriate thing to do, or if you'd like to see a different 
>>> solution?
>>
>> Please don't ping during the merge window. I'll probably look at this
>> patch next week.
>>
> 
> Sorry about pinging during the merge window.  At the time, I just 
> realized the patch has been on list for several weeks with no response, 
> but hadn't connected the dots that it happened to be the merge window at 
> that particular moment.
> 
> Any update on when you think you might get around to having a look at this?
> 

Ping? (again)

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.