[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190322141634.20664-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 22:16:34 +0800
From: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <agk@...hat.com>, <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] dm integrity: Make dm_integrity_init and dm_integrity_exit static
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:3619:12: warning:
symbol 'dm_integrity_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:3638:6: warning:
symbol 'dm_integrity_exit' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index d57d997..0932c32 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -3616,7 +3616,7 @@ static struct target_type integrity_target = {
.io_hints = dm_integrity_io_hints,
};
-int __init dm_integrity_init(void)
+static int __init dm_integrity_init(void)
{
int r;
@@ -3635,7 +3635,7 @@ int __init dm_integrity_init(void)
return r;
}
-void dm_integrity_exit(void)
+static void dm_integrity_exit(void)
{
dm_unregister_target(&integrity_target);
kmem_cache_destroy(journal_io_cache);
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists