| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACPcB9c+L581C1r=V-kwEuFQUqpqkRuLra1QiEV9am1RPSQAXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:02:50 +0800
From: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86/gart/kcore: Exclude GART aperture from kcore
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:06 AM Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On machines where the GART aperture is mapped over physical RAM,
> /proc/kcore contains the GART aperture range and reading it may lead
> to kernel panic.
>
> Vmcore used to have the same issue, until we fixed it in
> commit 2a3e83c6f96c ("x86/gart: Exclude GART aperture from vmcore")',
> leveraging existing hook infrastructure in vmcore to let /proc/vmcore
> return zeroes when attempting to read the aperture region, and so it
> won't read from the actual memory.
>
> We apply the same workaround for kcore. First implement the same hook
> infrastructure for kcore, then reuse the hook functions introduced in
> previous vmcore fix. Just with some minor adjustment, rename some
> functions for more general usage, and simplify the hook infrastructure
> a bit as there is no module usage yet.
>
> Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>
>
> ---
>
> Update from V4:
> - Remove the unregistering funtion and move functions never used after
> init to .init
>
> Update from V3:
> - Reuse the approach in V2, as Jiri noticed V3 approach may fail
> some use case. It introduce overlapped region in kcore, and can't
> garenteen the read request will fall into the region we wanted.
> - Improve some function naming suggested by Baoquan in V2.
> - Simplify the hook registering and checking, we are not exporting the
> hook register function for now, no need to make it that complex.
>
> Update from V2:
> Instead of repeating the same hook infrastructure for kcore, introduce
> a new kcore area type to avoid reading from, and let kcore always bypass
> this kind of area.
>
> Update from V1:
> Fix a complie error when CONFIG_PROC_KCORE is not set
>
> arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> fs/proc/kcore.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/kcore.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
> index 58176b56354e..294ed4392a0e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "AGP: " fmt
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kcore.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> @@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ int fallback_aper_force __initdata;
>
> int fix_aperture __initdata = 1;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE) || defined(CONFIG_PROC_KCORE)
> /*
> * If the first kernel maps the aperture over e820 RAM, the kdump kernel will
> * use the same range because it will remain configured in the northbridge.
> @@ -66,20 +67,25 @@ int fix_aperture __initdata = 1;
> */
> static unsigned long aperture_pfn_start, aperture_page_count;
>
> -static int gart_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
> +static int gart_mem_pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> return likely((pfn < aperture_pfn_start) ||
> (pfn >= aperture_pfn_start + aperture_page_count));
> }
>
> -static void exclude_from_vmcore(u64 aper_base, u32 aper_order)
> +static void __init exclude_from_core(u64 aper_base, u32 aper_order)
> {
> aperture_pfn_start = aper_base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> aperture_page_count = (32 * 1024 * 1024) << aper_order >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - WARN_ON(register_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(&gart_oldmem_pfn_is_ram));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE
> + WARN_ON(register_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(&gart_mem_pfn_is_ram));
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_KCORE
> + WARN_ON(register_mem_pfn_is_ram(&gart_mem_pfn_is_ram));
> +#endif
> }
> #else
> -static void exclude_from_vmcore(u64 aper_base, u32 aper_order)
> +static void exclude_from_core(u64 aper_base, u32 aper_order)
> {
> }
> #endif
> @@ -474,7 +480,7 @@ int __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void)
> * may have allocated the range over its e820 RAM
> * and fixed up the northbridge
> */
> - exclude_from_vmcore(last_aper_base, last_aper_order);
> + exclude_from_core(last_aper_base, last_aper_order);
>
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -520,7 +526,7 @@ int __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void)
> * overlap with the first kernel's memory. We can't access the
> * range through vmcore even though it should be part of the dump.
> */
> - exclude_from_vmcore(aper_alloc, aper_order);
> + exclude_from_core(aper_alloc, aper_order);
>
> /* Fix up the north bridges */
> for (i = 0; i < amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit; i++) {
> diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> index bbcc185062bb..d29d869abec1 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(kclist_head);
> static DECLARE_RWSEM(kclist_lock);
> static int kcore_need_update = 1;
>
> +/*
> + * Returns > 0 for RAM pages, 0 for non-RAM pages, < 0 on error
> + * Same as oldmem_pfn_is_ram in vmcore
> + */
> +static int (*mem_pfn_is_ram)(unsigned long pfn);
> +
> +int __init register_mem_pfn_is_ram(int (*fn)(unsigned long pfn))
> +{
> + if (mem_pfn_is_ram)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + mem_pfn_is_ram = fn;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + if (mem_pfn_is_ram)
> + return mem_pfn_is_ram(pfn);
> + else
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> /* This doesn't grab kclist_lock, so it should only be used at init time. */
> void __init kclist_add(struct kcore_list *new, void *addr, size_t size,
> int type)
> @@ -465,6 +487,11 @@ read_kcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t buflen, loff_t *fpos)
> goto out;
> }
> m = NULL; /* skip the list anchor */
> + } else if (!pfn_is_ram(__pa(start) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> + if (clear_user(buffer, tsz)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> } else if (m->type == KCORE_VMALLOC) {
> vread(buf, (char *)start, tsz);
> /* we have to zero-fill user buffer even if no read */
> diff --git a/include/linux/kcore.h b/include/linux/kcore.h
> index 8c3f8c14eeaa..c843f4a9c512 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kcore.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kcore.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ void kclist_add_remap(struct kcore_list *m, void *addr, void *vaddr, size_t sz)
> m->vaddr = (unsigned long)vaddr;
> kclist_add(m, addr, sz, KCORE_REMAP);
> }
> +
> +extern int __init register_mem_pfn_is_ram(int (*fn)(unsigned long pfn));
> #else
> static inline
> void kclist_add(struct kcore_list *new, void *addr, size_t size, int type)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Ping? Can any one help to take this patch?
--
Best Regards,
Kairui Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists