[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <742758434301d3329b336fd9c683dc753fbdc552.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:14:41 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
"Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@....com>,
"Laktyushkin, Dmytro" <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@....com>,
"Li, Sun peng (Leo)" <Sunpeng.Li@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix boolean expression in
get_surf_rq_param
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 22:10 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> I noticed this patch is already in mainline, but the stable tag
> was removed. What is the reason for that if this bug is present
> in stable?
It's not a bug, it's just a style issue and
the && use in some compilers it may be slower.
bool when set is 1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists