[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d15cb2bc-aa9a-d96a-cb22-91820575cc49@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:30:40 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@....com>,
"Laktyushkin, Dmytro" <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@....com>,
"Li, Sun peng (Leo)" <Sunpeng.Li@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix boolean expression in
get_surf_rq_param
On 3/21/19 10:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 22:10 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi Harry,
>>
>> I noticed this patch is already in mainline, but the stable tag
>> was removed. What is the reason for that if this bug is present
>> in stable?
>
> It's not a bug, it's just a style issue and
> the && use in some compilers it may be slower.
>
You're right. What might be a bug in some cases
is the other way around.
Thanks, Joe.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists